|
|||
![]() |
|
Archives
« 5 Paragraph Essay: The hell? |
Main
| The MoveOn.org Ads »
December 04, 2003More on writingReading about the 5 paragraph essay earlier today and thinking about my just completed ad class got me thinking about writing. When you write an essay you usually follow the standard thesis, supporting points, conclusion format. You assume that your reader will read the whole thing. In an ad you not only assume that your reader won’t read your copy, but you assume that he will be actively hostile toward it and will go out of his way to avoid it. You have to grab his attention with an interesting headline, visual or combination of the two, draw him into your text and make sure he comes out with a positive impression of your product. However, they are both attempts to persuade the reader. To get your point across. This is just the type of writing Calpundit mentions as fitting the 5 paragraph (or really 5 section) essay. The whole format is geared toward making a persuasive case, and how often does that come up in real life? He says while ironically making a persuasive case as he does several times a day, very well, on his blog. In some sense all writing is persuasive; even an instruction manual is trying to persuade you to operate your new machine correctly. He also gives this advice: …ignore anyone who tells you to write like you talk. This is possibly the worst writing advice ever to gain wide popularity. Honest. This is indeed the first piece of advice I have seen about writing advertising copy and it isn’t wrong. It doesn’t mean to literally write the words as you would speak them. If you actually listen of a recording of a real conversation you would probably be amazed just how incoherent it sounds. But you have to listen to a recording or read a transcript for it to look confusing. When you are having a conversation it sounds natural and makes sense. Writing like you talk means that your reader should feel as though she is listening to a conversation. It means you should avoid sounding stilted or confusing. Your writing should flow. It should be easy to understand and get your point across clearly. It should not sound like the typical academic paper or corporate memo. Calpundit does this well. When I read him, I feel like I am listening to a persuasive argument, not wading my way through a policy statement. The best advice I have heard on this comes from the copywriter Luke Sullivan: Write like you talk. This is from Sullivan’s excellent book on creating advertising. I am trying to be an Art Director, not a Copywriter, but I feel it is very important to understand writing ads if I plan on going into advertising. Posted by Jeremy at 09:45 PM | Link
| TrackBack (0)
Comments
Jeremy: (Just posted this reply to you post over at calpundit, thought I'd share it here too. Nice blog.) Great pointer to Luke's book. (We've both worked at the same agency.) It is well worth a read for anyone interested in persuasion--in any format. And, it seems, that's the knock to Kevin's theory. The point is always persuasion. Otherwise, what is the point? Structuring any plausible argument or premise requires some kind of framework and that's all the 5-point essay is. It keeps you honest and coherent. Once you've got your concept knocked, then focus on finding the whiplash element that comes out of nowhere to cement the deal: Unconventional proof. Why? Skepticism. No shortage of words out there, very little worth reading. (This post included, probably.) If feature-advantage-benefit is all you've got, ad copy to State of the Union Address, you're screwed. Just remember, unconventional proof usually requires unconventional delivery to be authentic.That's where teachers get caught in their process knickers when teaching and end up shortchanging kids: rules are to be taught, then folded, spindled and mutilated to wring every bit of power out of them. Kids. Breaking rules. Writing. Avocation ensues. Go figure. *** Okay, there endeth my 5-pointer. I've been hesitant to dive in on this one because, well, I'm a copywriter before being a creative director and we, uh, don't do "real" writing. Good luck with the Art Direction. Post a comment
|
|
|
Archives
February 2004
January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003
Recent Entries
Awwwww
Citibank and Subjectivity Site update Cheesy Cool Visual Neocons Changing URLs in comment body New Comments On the candidates New ad class
Links
Blogs
Sam Talbot
From the brilliant communist mind.
Tom Tommorow
Great Cartoonist. Great Blog.
Jim Henley
An insightful libertarian.
Atrios
The top liberal blog.
Kos
Interesting political analysis and other rants.
Tacitus
The left's favorite conservative.
Patrick Nielsen Hayden
Luminous Liberal
Many folks
The no war blog.
amptoons
Another Cartoonist
August J. Pollak
Yet Another Cartoonist. This one is still in school.
Adam Felber
Funny. Liberal.
Gene Healy
Man from Cato
Julian Sanchez
Also from Cato
Radly Balko
Libertarian. Well published.
Joshua Micah Marshall
Washington insider journalist
Hesiod
Big Blue Blog
Kevin Drum
A good read even if I can't think of a snarky comment.
Matthew Yeglesias
Claims to be: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Really is: Harvard Philosophy Student.
N.Z. Bear
Conservative and creator of the ecosystem.
Kynn
News
The Best News Site
The Paper of Record
Capitol Paper
From accross the pond
er.. newsmax
Failing web mag still puts out some good articles
Funny
nuff said
Bwah ha ha
Snicker
General Tech
News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
Great resources from the book publisher.
Excellent data for CSS and HTML
Perl Modules
The web scripting language
Apple & Macintosh
The company itself
Like slashdot but for apple.
Funniest Apple Site
Self explanatory
Entertainment
New York's Blog
Links to some excellent writing
Hysterical Recaps of Shows
More funny things about television
Celebrity Snark
Other
Discussion of current events.
More Discussion
Indescribable
|